Call us toll-free

Quick academic help

Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.

Calculate the price


275 Words


Article: NIH Grant Applications - The Anatomy of a Specific Aims Page

Often you can present the hypothesis and the supporting reasoning in one paragraph. In more complex labs, especially those with multiple procedures and therefore multiple hypotheses, you may need more paragraphs, perhaps one for each hypothesis.

Applications must include: - One-page hypothesis and specific aims of your project

The first is found at the end of the Introduction where you present your hypothesis, which drives scientific inquiry. You can improve this part of the report by (1) restating the hypothesis so that it more clearly and more specifically presents your educated guess of the outcomes of the experimental procedure and (2) enhancing the logic that you use to show how you have reasoned from what you know about the scientific concept to your hypothesis. You may need to make the links in that logical chain clearer to the reader, or you may need to entirely rethink your reasoning (which could lead to a different hypothesis).

How to Write Guide: Sections of the Paper - Bates College

Aims and Objectives for Teaching and Learning

The type of content specified in statements of aims and objectives will vary with the level. Objectives, particularly those concerned with academic content, will be defined in more detail at the lower levels of the hierarchy; ie at the level of the course and individual teaching session. At the level of department or degree programme, it is likely to be more appropriate to define an aim in terms of the overall scope of the subject and also in terms of the qualities which it is intended that a student in that discipline would develop on the programme.

After stating the judgment about the hypothesis, you should provide specific evidence from the data in the Results to back up the judgment. The first key to improving this part of the Discussion is finding specific evidence reported in the Results that you can use to back up your judgment about your hypothesis. The second key is to describe the evidence in such a way that the reader can clearly see that there is sufficient evidence that supports your judgment about the hypothesis. Be specific. Point out specific evidence from the Results and show how that evidence contributed to your judgment about the hypothesis.

Argument | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

08/04/2013 · This should not be news to you

There are a number of circumstances in which aims and objectives can be specified. These are set out in Figure 1 in the form of hierarchy in which the higher levels (eg the degree programme) should determine the nature of the aims and objectives adopted for the lower level (eg a course). Or, to put the point in another way, the achievement of higher level aims will depend on achieving lower level aims. The key question to ask is: "How will the aim and objective for this individual teaching session help achieve the overall aim and objectives of the course?"

This paper is concerned with the definition of aims and objectives for teaching and learning; that is with the prior specification of what teachers intend to teach or what it is hoped learners will learn. The paper also discusses important links between objectives and assessment.

Unfortunately, many textbooks promulgate misconceptions about the nature and process of science
Order now

    As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.


    Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.


    We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.


    We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.


    Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.

  • 24/7 SUPPORT

    We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.

Order now

J Emerg Trauma Shock, official publication of the INDUSEM

4. If the results do not support your hypothesis, then explain why not; consider (1) problems with your understanding of the lab's scientific concept; (2) problems with your reasoning, and/or (3) problems with the laboratory procedure itself (if there are problems of reliability with the lab data or if you made any changes in the lab procedure, discuss these in detail, showing specifically how they could have affected the results and how the errors could have been eliminated).

Journal of Hepatology - Elsevier

Applications must include: - One-page hypothesis and specific aims of your project. This can be very brief, sufficient for the reader to understand the importance of what is being proposed. Specifics such as numbers of animals, etc., are not initially needed because this will be determined in conjunction with the Core Leaders if the proposal is selected for further consideration. Please indicate which Cores of the Center will be needed for your studies. It is strongly suggested that you contact the Core Leaders (see above) in advance of submitting your proposal. If you have consulted with one or more Core Leaders during the development of your proposal, please so state in your application. - Your NIH Biosketch and the Biosketches of any proposed collaborators. - A budget is not initially required. If your proposal is selected for further consideration, a budget will be developed based on a power analysis of the number of samples, animals, etc., that will be needed for the successful development of your project.

What is EAT? Science, politics and business sharing food for thought.

CORRECTION: This misconception is based on the idea of falsification, philosopher Karl Popper's influential account of scientific justification, which suggests that all science can do is reject, or falsify, hypotheses — that science cannot find evidence that one idea over others. Falsification was a popular philosophical doctrine — especially with scientists — but it was soon recognized that falsification wasn't a very complete or accurate picture of how scientific knowledge is built. In science, ideas can never be completely proved or completely disproved. Instead, science accepts or rejects ideas based on supporting and refuting evidence, and may revise those conclusions if warranted by new evidence or perspectives.

Order now
  • You submit your order instructions

  • We assign an appropriate expert

  • The expert takes care of your task

  • We send it to you upon completion

Order now
  • 37 684

    Delivered orders

  • 763

    Professional writers

  • 311

    Writers online

  • 4.8/5

    Average quality score

Order now
  • Kim

    "I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."

  • Paul

    "Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."

  • Ellen

    "Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."

  • Joyce

    "Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."

  • Albert

    "Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."

  • Mary

    "Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."

Ready to tackle your homework?

Place an order