Call us toll-free

Quick academic help

Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.

Calculate the price

Pages:

275 Words

$19,50

Limitations of the Efficient Market Hypothesis

The concept of Efficient Market Hypothesis has weak foundations. The effectiveness of these hypothesis depends upon validity of one of the three conditions viz. rational investment decisions, independent irrational investment decisions, and arbitrage. In practice, none of these three conditions are valid. An alternative approach, to explain capital market behavior, based on psychology is gaining importance in the field of finance.

An alternative approach, to explain capital market ..

The Behavioral Challenge to Market Efficiency
According to behavioral finance, none of the above three conditions are likely to hold good in reality.
1. Rationality: Investors are not always rational. Many investors do not achieve the degree of diversification that they should. Most of the investors trade frequently and incur higher brokerage costs and taxes. Actually, taxes can be minimized by selling losers and holding winners. But many investors do just the opposite. The view of behavioral finance is that, not all investors are rational. Thus, the first condition for market efficiency does not hold good in real world.
2. Independent deviations from rationality: Deviations from rationality are not random, thus they are not likely to cancel out in a whole population of investors. It is not uncommon in the market place that investors over value an upcoming new sector like internet, information technology or biotechnology. In these cases, investors believe that current performance of these sectors is representative of the future performance. This behavior of representativeness leads to bubbles in the markets, which is not explained by efficient market hypothesis. On the other hand, there are some conservative investors who are too sluggish to adjust to new information. This results in a slow process of price adjustment to new relevant information. This is against the concept of efficient market hypothesis.
3. Arbitrage: Though, in theory, arbitrage is a risk-less process, in practice it is likely to be more risky. Suppose professional investors generally believe that Tata Motors is under priced. They would buy it, while selling their holding in Maruti Suzuki. However, if amateurs were taking opposite positions, price would adjust to correct level only if the positions of amateurs were small relative to those of the professionals. In a world of many amateurs, a few professionals would have to take big positions to bring prices into equilibrium, perhaps even engaging heavily in short selling. Buying large amount of one stock and short selling large amount of other stock is quite risky, even if the two stocks are in the same industry. Here, unanticipated bad new about Tata Motors and unanticipated good news about Maruti Suzuki would cause professionals to register large losses. Apart from that, even if amateurs did actually misprice Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki, there is no guarantee that this mispricing would be corrected in short term. This also causes professionals to register losses by liquidating their positions before the equilibrium is established in the prices.
Limits to Arbitrage: Arbitrageurs face practical risks costs while exploiting mispricing and facilitating establishment of equilibrium in prices. The first risk is fundamental risk. This risk exists due to non-existence of perfect substitute stock for mispriced stock. For all practical purposes Maruti Suzuki is not a perfect substitute for Tata Motors even though both the companies operate in the same industry. They differ in terms of sales volume, product profile, management style etc. The second risk is noise trader risk. This is risk that mispricing being exploited by the arbitrageurs worsens in the short run. The possibility of the price of Tata Motors stock going further down and the price of Maruti Suzuki stock going further up due to company specific bad or good news can not be ruled out. Once one has granted the possibility that a security's price can be different from its fundamental value (equilibrium price), one must also grant the possibility that future price movements will increase the divergence between actual value and fundamental value. Noise trader risk forces arbitrageurs to liquidate their positions early, bringing them potentially steep losses. The third limitation of arbitrage process is implementation costs. Transaction costs such as brokerage costs and taxes can make arbitraging less attractive. There are real life examples of how these limitations of arbitrage kill the process of arbitrage.
We have seen in companies like Enron and Worldcom, how managers dupe investors through creative accounting. Firms successfully time their debt and equity issues by issuing equity during bullish equity market and debt during bearish equity markets. Firms do cancel IPOs even just before the opening of the issues, like Wockhardt Hospitals and Emaar MGF, if market conditions change against equity. Firms also defer their IPOs, like ICICI Securities Ltd, due to adverse market for equity offerings. We also have evidences of insider trading, managers and promoters benefitting from inside/private information.
In conclusion, the arguments presented here suggest that the theoretical underpinnings of the efficient capital markets hypothesis might not hold well in reality. That is, investors may be irrational, irrationality may be related across investors rather than cancelling out across investors, and arbitrage strategies may involve too much risk to eliminate market inefficiencies.

Efficient-market hypothesis - Wikipedia

The efficient-market hypothesis ..

Since the beginning of the fall of monetarism in the mid-1980s, mainstream macroeconomics has incorporated many of the principles of post-Keynesian endogenous money theory. This paper argues that the most important critical component of post-Keynesian monetary theory today is its rejection of the “natural rate of interest.” By examining the hidden assumptions of the loanable funds doctrine as it was modified in light of the idea of a natural rate of interest—specifically, its implicit reliance on an “efficient markets hypothesis” view of capital markets—this paper seeks to show that the mainstream view of capital markets is completely at odds with the world of fundamental uncertainty addressed by post-Keynesian economists, a world in which Keynesian liquidity preference and animal spirits rule the roost. This perspective also allows us to shed new light on the debate that has sprung up around the work of Hyman Minsky, calling into question to what extent he rejected the loanable funds view of financial markets. When Minsky’s theories are examined against the backdrop of the natural rate of interest version of the loanable funds theory, it quickly becomes clear that Minsky does not fall into the loanable funds camp.

One such error that might explain overreaction in stock ..

12/01/2018 · The financial markets context

3 The Efficient Markets Hypothesis ..
Order now
  • UNMATCHED QUALITY

    As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.

  • STRICT PRIVACY

    Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.

  • COMPLETE ORIGINALITY

    We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.

  • ON-TIME DELIVERY

    We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.

  • FREE CORRECTIONS

    Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.

  • 24/7 SUPPORT

    We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.

Order now
  • You submit your order instructions

  • We assign an appropriate expert

  • The expert takes care of your task

  • We send it to you upon completion

Order now
  • 37 684

    Delivered orders

  • 763

    Professional writers

  • 311

    Writers online

  • 4.8/5

    Average quality score

Order now
  • Kim

    "I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."

  • Paul

    "Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."

  • Ellen

    "Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."

  • Joyce

    "Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."

  • Albert

    "Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."

  • Mary

    "Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."

Ready to tackle your homework?

Place an order